Comparación entre las técnicas de impresión digital y la impresión convencional en la línea de terminación marginal. estudio in vitro Lima -2021
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Privada de Huancayo Franklin Roosevelt
DOI
Abstract
Este trabajo de investigación es para Determinar si existe diferencia significativa de precisión en la línea de terminación marginal entre los sistemas de impresión digital y la impresión convencional. Para ello Se tallaron 20 piezas dentarias de tipodont de acrílicos, luego se tomaron impresión digital con un scanner intraoral, para comparar se digitalizaron las impresiones de silicona con un scanner de laboratorio, así mismo se digitalizó el modelo patrón con scanner de laboratorio de alta precisión, después de tomar medidas y hacer comparaciones, la técnica de impresión digital se obtuvo un promedio de error de 1,66 y la impresión convencional un promedio de error de 2.28 .Concluyendo ,la impresión digital es más precisa que la convencional la impresión digital
This research work is to determine if there is a significant difference in precision in the marginal finishing line between the digital impression systems and the conventional impression. To do this, 20 dental pieces of acrylics tipodont were carved, then digital impressions were taken with an intraoral scanner, to compare the silicone impressions were digitized with a laboratory scanner, likewise the pattern model was digitized with a high precision laboratory scanner, after taking measurements and making comparisons, the digital impression technique obtained an average error of 1.66 and the conventional impression an average error of 2.28, concluding, the digital impression is more accurate than the conventional digital impression
This research work is to determine if there is a significant difference in precision in the marginal finishing line between the digital impression systems and the conventional impression. To do this, 20 dental pieces of acrylics tipodont were carved, then digital impressions were taken with an intraoral scanner, to compare the silicone impressions were digitized with a laboratory scanner, likewise the pattern model was digitized with a high precision laboratory scanner, after taking measurements and making comparisons, the digital impression technique obtained an average error of 1.66 and the conventional impression an average error of 2.28, concluding, the digital impression is more accurate than the conventional digital impression
Description
Keywords
Citation
Vancouver
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
