Deficiencias en la regulación de medicamentos y dispositivos médicos en Perú: comparación con la FDA y recomendaciones – Lima 2026
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Privada de Huancayo Franklin Roosevelt
DOI
Abstract
La investigación tuvo como objetivo analizar las deficiencias en la regulación peruana de medicamentos y dispositivos médicos mediante su comparación con la FDA. Se empleó un enfoque cualitativo, de tipo básico, diseño no experimental y método comparativo. La muestra estuvo conformada por 12 documentos regulatorios oficiales, 6 del Perú y 6 de la FDA. Se aplicó análisis documental mediante fichas y una matriz de extracción de evidencia. Los resultados evidenciaron mayor desarrollo de la FDA en evaluación científica, vigilancia poscomercialización y fiscalización basada en riesgo. En el Perú se identificaron brechas en evaluación especializada, vigilancia sanitaria, digitalización y capacidad operativa. Se concluyó que el Perú cuenta con una base normativa, pero requiere fortalecer sus capacidades técnicas, operativas y tecnológicas.
The research aimed to analyze the shortcomings in Peruvian regulation of medicines and medical devices by comparing it with the FDA. A qualitative, basic, non-experimental, and comparative approach was used. The sample consisted of 12 official regulatory documents, 6 from Peru and 6 from the FDA. Document analysis was conducted using data collection forms and an evidence extraction matrix. The results showed that the FDA is more developed in scientific evaluation, post-marketing surveillance, and risk-based enforcement. In Peru, gaps were identified in specialized evaluation, health surveillance, digitalization, and operational capacity. It was concluded that Peru has a regulatory framework but needs to strengthen its technical, operational, and technological capacities.
The research aimed to analyze the shortcomings in Peruvian regulation of medicines and medical devices by comparing it with the FDA. A qualitative, basic, non-experimental, and comparative approach was used. The sample consisted of 12 official regulatory documents, 6 from Peru and 6 from the FDA. Document analysis was conducted using data collection forms and an evidence extraction matrix. The results showed that the FDA is more developed in scientific evaluation, post-marketing surveillance, and risk-based enforcement. In Peru, gaps were identified in specialized evaluation, health surveillance, digitalization, and operational capacity. It was concluded that Peru has a regulatory framework but needs to strengthen its technical, operational, and technological capacities.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Vancouver
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
